References

Abbott A. 2004. Junior biologists score partial victory over lab conditions. Nature 430:7.
Adams J. 2012. The rise of research networks. Nature 490:335–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/490335a.
Adams D. 2017. The Ultimate Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy: The Complete Trilogy in Five Parts. Pan Macmillan.
Afonso A. 2014. How academia resembles a drug gang.
Allen GE, Baker JJW. 2017. Scientific Process and Social Issues in Biology Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44380-5.
Anatomical Terminology FC on. 1998. Terminologia anatomica: International anatomical terminology. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.
Anatomical Terminology FIC on. 2008. Terminologia Histologica: International Terms for Human Cytology and Histology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Anatomical Terminology FIP for. 2013. Terminologia Embryologica: International Embryological Terminology. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag.
Anatomical Terminology FIP for. 2017. Terminologia Neuroanatomica: International Neuroanatomical Terminology. Stuttgart: Thieme.
Angler MW. 2020. Telling Science Stories: Reporting, Crafting and Editing for Journalists and Scientists. Routledge.
Bacon F. 1620. Novum organum. Ellis; J. Spedding (transl.).
Baker M. 2016. 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility : Nature News & Comment. Nature 533:452–454. DOI: doi:10.1038/533452a.
Becker FS, Tolley KA, Measey J, Altwegg R. 2018. Extreme climate-induced life-history plasticity in an amphibian. The American Naturalist 191:250–258. DOI: DOI: 10.1086/695315.
Bonney R, Shirk JL, Phillips TB, Wiggins A, Ballard HL, Miller-Rushing AJ, Parrish JK. 2014. Next steps for citizen science. Science 343:1436–1437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251554.
Bouton ME. 1993. Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning. Psychological Bulletin 114:80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.80.
Britton J, Buscha F, Dickson M, Erve LV der, Vignoles A, Walker I, Waltmann B, Zhu Y. 2020. The earnings returns to postgraduate degrees in the UK.
Bump JK, Tischler KB, Schrank AJ, Peterson RO, Vucetich JA. 2009. Large herbivores and aquatic–terrestrial links in southern boreal forests. Journal of Animal Ecology 78:338–345. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01498.x.
Casadevall A, Fang FC. 2012. Reforming Science: Methodological and Cultural Reforms. Infection and Immunity 80:891–896. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.06183-11.
Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C. 2009. Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Diversity and Distributions 15:22–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x.
Chamberlain S. 2016. Ten types of PhD supervisor relationships – which is yours? The Conversation.
Christensen KK. 2005. Bologna seminar doctoral programmes for the European knowledge society.
Clance PR, Imes SA. 1978. The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women: Dynamics and therapeutic intervention. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice 15:241–247. DOI: 10.1037/h0086006.
Collins JP, Crump ML, Lovejoy III TE. 2009. Extinction in our times: Global amphibian decline. Oxford University Press.
Cope B, Kalantzis M, Abd-El-Khalick F, Bagley E. 2013. Science in writing: Learning scientific argument in principle and practice. E-learning and Digital Media 10:420–441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2013.10.4.420.
Cronin B. 2001. Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52:558–569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.1097.
Culumber ZW, Anaya-Rojas JM, Booker WW, Hooks AP, Lange EC, Pluer B, Ramirez-Bullon N, Travis J. 2019. Widespread biases in ecological and evolutionary studies. BioScience 69:631–640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biz063.
Daudin F-M. 1802. Histoire naturelle des rainettes, des grenouilles et des crapauds. Avec planches. Levrault.
Dawkins R. 2004. A devil’s chaplain: Reflections on hope, lies, science, and love. Mariner Books.
Delgado Lopez-Cozar E, Robinson-Garcia N, Torres-Salinas D. 2014. The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 65:446–454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23056.
Dhar PK, Giuliani A. 2010. Laws of biology: Why so few? Systems and Synthetic Biology 4:7–13. DOI: 10.1007/s11693-009-9049-0.
Dickerson D. 2019. How I overcame impostor syndrome after leaving academia. Nature 574:588–588. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03036-y.
Dougherty J, Ilyankou I. 2021. Hands-On Data Visualization. O’Reilly Media, Inc.
Dumeril C, Bibron G. 1841. Erpetologie generale ou histoire naturelle complete des reptiles: Comprenant l’histoire generale des batraciens, et la description des cinquante-deux genres et des cent soixante-trois especes des deux premiers sous-ordres: Les peromeles... Imp. de Fain et Thunot.
Dunleavy P. 2003. Authoring a PhD. London: Palgrave.
Dunleavy P. 2017. Citations are more than merely assigning credit – their inclusion (or not) conditions how colleagues regard and evaluate your work. Impact of Social Sciences.
Enfield N. 2018. Our job as scientists is to find the truth. But we must also be storytellers. The Guardian.
Fanelli D. 2010. Positive results increase down the hierarchy of the sciences. PLOS ONE 5:e10068. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068.
Firth K. 2017. Writing a PhD in your second language: Seven reasons you’re doing great and five ways to do even better. Impact of Social Sciences.
Forstmeier W, Wagenmakers E-J, Parker TH. 2017. Detecting and avoiding likely false-positive findings–a practical guide. Biological Reviews 92:1941–1968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12315.
Freeman P, Robbins A. 2006. The Publishing Gap Between Rich and Poor: The Focus of AuthorAID. Journal of Public Health Policy 27:196–203. DOI: DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jphp.3200071.
Frost DR. 2020. Amphibian species of the world: An online reference, version 5.4.
Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CF, De Sa RO, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Campbell JA, Blotto BL, Moler P, Drewes RC, Nussbaum RA, Lynch JD, Green DM, Wheeler WC. 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of natural History 2006:1–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:TATOL]2.0.CO;2.
Galef J. 2021. The Scout Mindset: Why Some People See Things Clearly and Others Don’t. Portfolio.
Geraldi J. 2021. Self-Plagiarism in Project Studies: A Call for Action and Reflection. Project Management Journal 52:119–126. DOI: 10.1177/8756972820982445.
Gerber M, Brand S, Herrmann C, Colledge F, Holsboer-Trachsler E, Pühse U. 2014. Increased objectively assessed vigorous-intensity exercise is associated with reduced stress, increased mental health and good objective and subjective sleep in young adults. Physiology & Behavior 135:17–24. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.047.
Geven K, Skopek J, Triventi M. 2018. How to Increase PhD Completion Rates? An Impact Evaluation of Two Reforms in a Selective Graduate School, 1976–2012. Research in Higher Education 59:529–552. DOI: 10.1007/s11162-017-9481-z.
Ghrouz AK, Noohu MM, Dilshad Manzar Md, Warren Spence D, BaHammam AS, Pandi-Perumal SR. 2019. Physical activity and sleep quality in relation to mental health among college students. Sleep and Breathing 23:627–634. DOI: 10.1007/s11325-019-01780-z.
Grasdalsmoen M, Eriksen HR, Lønning KJ, Sivertsen B. 2020. Physical exercise, mental health problems, and suicide attempts in university students. BMC Psychiatry 20:1–11. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02583-3.
Hall S, Moskovitz C, Pemberton M. 2021. Understanding Text Recycling: A Guide for Researchers. Text Recycling Research Project.
Harwood N. 2009. An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines. Journal of Pragmatics 41:497–518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001.
Harzing AW. 2007. Publish or Perish.
Hasgall A, Saenen B, Borrell-Damian L. 2019. Doctoral education in Europe today: Approaches and institutional structures.
Healy K. 2018. Data visualization: A practical introduction. Princeton University Press.
Heger T, Jeschke JM. 2018. The hierarchy-of-hypotheses approach updated: A toolbox for structuring and analysing theory, research, and evidence. In: Jeschke JM, Heger T eds. Invasion Biology: Hypotheses and evidence. CABI INVASIVES SERIES. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 38–46.
Hess DR. 2004. How to write an effective discussion. Respiratory Care 49:1238–1241.
Hirsch JE. 2005. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102:16569–16572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102.
Hotaling S. 2018. Publishing papers while keeping everything in balance: Practical advice for a productive graduate school experience. Ideas in Ecology and Evolution 11:35–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4033/iee.2018.11.5.f.
Hotaling S. 2020. Simple rules for concise scientific writing. Limnology & Oceanography Letters 5:379–383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10165.
Husemann M, Rogers R, Meyer S, Habel JC. 2017. Publicationism and scientists’ satisfaction depend on gender, career stage and the wider academic system. Palgrave Communications 3:1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.32.
Hutchins HM, Rainbolt H. 2017. What triggers imposter phenomenon among academic faculty? A critical incident study exploring antecedents, coping, and development opportunities. Human Resource Development International 20:194–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2016.1248205.
Ioannidis JPA. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine 2:e124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
Jenicek M. 2006. How to read, understand, and write ’Discussion’ sections in medical articles. An exercise in critical thinking. Medical Science Monitor 12:28–36.
Katz Y. 2013. Against storytelling of scientific results. Nature Methods 10:1045–1045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2699.
Kerr NL. 1998. HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and social psychology review 2:196–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207%2Fs15327957pspr0203_4.
Lawton JH. 1999. Are There General Laws in Ecology? Oikos 84:177–192. DOI: 10.2307/3546712.
Levecque K, Anseel F, De Beuckelaer A, Van der Heyden J, Gisle L. 2017. Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy 46:868–879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008.
Linnaeus C. 1753. Species plantarum. Laurentius Salvius.
Linnaeus C. 1758. Systema naturae. Stockholm Laurentii Salvii.
Litalien D. 2015. Improving PhD completion rates: Where should we start?
Louw H. 2017. Defining plagiarism: Student and staff perceptions of a grey concept. South African Journal of Higher Education 31:116–135. DOI: 10.20853/31-5-580.
Malaga-Trillo E, Gerlach G. 2004. Meyer case poses a challenge to the system. Nature 431:505–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/431505b.
Marks MS, Marsh M, Schroer TA, Stevens TH. 2013. Misuse of journal impact factors in scientific assessment. Traffic 14:611–612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tra.12075.
Martin-Martin A, Orduna-Malea E, Thelwall M, Lopez-Cozar ED. 2018. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. Journal of informetrics 12:1160–1177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.09.002.
McGill B. 2016. The 5 pivotal paragraphs in a paper. Dynamic Ecology.
Measey J, Vimercati G, De Villiers F, Mokhatla M, Davies S, Thorp C, Rebelo A, Kumschick S. 2016. A global assessment of alien amphibian impacts in a formal framework. Diversity and Distributions 22:970–981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12462.
Mueller PA, Oppenheimer DM. 2014. The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science 25:1159–1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581.
Murray R. 2011. Skillful writing of an awful research paper. Analytical Chemistry 83:633–633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac2000169.
Nosek BA, Ebersole CR, DeHaven AC, Mellor DT. 2018. The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115:2600–2606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114.
Nuñez MA, Amano T. 2021. Monolingual searches can limit and bias results in global literature reviews. Nature Ecology & Evolution 5:264–264. DOI: 10.1038/s41559-020-01369-w.
Ohler A, Dubois A. 2016. The identity of the South African toad Sclerophrys capensis Tschudi, 1838 (Amphibia, Anura). PeerJ 4:e1553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1553.
Pandey S, Pandey S, Dwivedi S, Pandey D, Mishra H, Mahapatra S. 2020. Methods of Various Citing and Referencing Style: Fundamentals for Early Career Researchers. Publishing Research Quarterly 36:243–253. DOI: 10.1007/s12109-020-09726-0.
Park C. 2005. New Variant PhD: The changing nature of the doctorate in the UK. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 27:189–207. DOI: 10.1080/13600800500120068.
Perneger TV. 2010. Citation analysis of identical consensus statements revealed journal-related bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63:660–664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.012.
Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, Brooks TM, Gittleman JL, Joppa LN, Raven PH, Roberts CM, Sexton JO. 2014. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344:1246752. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1246752.
Pinker S. 2014. Why AcademicsWriting Stinks.
Plaxco KW. 2010. The art of writing science. Protein Science 19:2261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.514.
Popper K. 2005. The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing.
Raan AF van, Moed HF, Leeuwen TN van. 2007. Scoping study on the use of bibliometric analysis to measure the quality of research in UK higher education institutions.
Roche DG, Kruuk LE, Lanfear R, Binning SA. 2015. Public data archiving in ecology and evolution: How well are we doing? PLOS Biology 13:e1002295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002295.
Rubin M. 2020. Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings? arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.10513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.160349187.73858736/v1.
Sagan C. 2011. The demon-haunted world: Science as a candle in the dark. Ballantine Books.
Scheel AM. 2020. Registered Reports: A process to safeguard high-quality evidence. Quality of Life Research 29:3181–3182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02698-w.
Schloss PD. 2018. The Riffomonas Reproducible Research Tutorial Series. Journal of Open Source Education 1:13. DOI: 10.21105/jose.00013.
Shashok K. 2008. Content and communication: How can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing? BMC medical research methodology 8:1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-3.
Silvertown J. 2009. A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 24:467–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017.
Simmons JP, Nelson LD, Simonsohn U. 2011. False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science 22:1359–1366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632.
Smaldino PE, McElreath R. 2016. The natural selection of bad science. Royal Society Open Science 3:160384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384.
Statzner B, Resh VH. 2010. Negative changes in the scientific publication process in ecology: Potential causes and consequences. Freshwater Biology 55:2639–2653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02484.x.
Stergiou KI, Lessenich S. 2014. On impact factors and university rankings: From birth to boycott. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 13:101–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00141.
Strevens M. 2003. The Role of the Priority Rule in Science. The Journal of Philosophy 100:55–79.
Stubb J, Pyhältö K, Lonka K. 2011. Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education 33:33–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2010.515572.
Sullivan I, DeHaven A, Mellor D. 2019. Open and reproducible research on open science framework. Current Protocols Essential Laboratory Techniques 18:e32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cpet.32.
Şanlı Ö, Erdem S, Tefik T. 2013. How to write a discussion section? Turkish Journal of Urology 39:20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2013.049.
Taşkın Z, Doğan G, Kulczycki E, Zuccala AA. 2020. Long read Science needs to inform the public. That can’t be done solely in English. LSE COVID-19.
Teixeira da Silva J, Al-Khatib A, Dobranszki J. 2017. Fortifying the Corrective Nature of Post-publication Peer Review: Identifying Weaknesses, Use of Journal Clubs, and Rewarding Conscientious Behavior. Science & Engineering Ethics 23:1213–1226. DOI: DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9854-2.
Theurillat J-P, Willner W, Fernández‐González F, Bültmann H, Čarni A, Gigante D, Mucina L, Weber H. 2021. International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature. 4th edition. Applied Vegetation Science 24:e12491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12491.
Tomaska L. 2007. Teaching How to Prepare a Manuscript by Means of Rewriting Published Scientific Papers. Genetics 175:17–20. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.106.066217.
Torres DH, Pruim DE. 2019. Scientific storytelling: A narrative strategy for scientific communicators. Communication Teacher 33:107–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2017.1400679.
Toulmin SE. 2003. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
Travassos-Britto B, Pardini R, El-Hani CN, Prado PI. 2021. Towards a pragmatic view of theories in ecology. Oikos 130:821–830. DOI: 10.1111/oik.07314.
Trivers R. 2011. The Folly of Fools: The Logic of Deceit and Self-Deception in Human Life. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Tschudi J. 1838. Classification der Batrachier. Mem. Soc. Sci.
Turbek SP, Chock TM, Donahue K, Havrilla CA, Oliverio AM, Polutchko SK, Shoemaker LG, Vimercati L. 2016. Scientific Writing Made Easy: A Step-by-Step Guide to Undergraduate Writing in the Biological Sciences. The Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 97:417–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bes2.1258.
Uhlmann EL, Ebersole CR, Chartier CR, Errington TM, Kidwell MC, Lai CK, McCarthy RJ, Riegelman A, Silberzahn R, Nosek BA. 2019. Scientific utopia III: Crowdsourcing science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 14:711–733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561.
Vellend M. 2010. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. The Quarterly review of biology 85:183–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/652373.
Vences M, Zardoya R. 2004. Meyer: Disagreements but no misconduct. Nature 431:505–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/431505c.
Vonnegut K. 1980. How to write with style. International Paper:2.
Vonnegut K. 1982. How to write with style. In: How to Use the Power of the Printed Word. Anchor Press,.
Wake DB, Vredenburg VT. 2008. Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:11466–11473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0801921105.
Wang YT, Taylor L, Pearl M, Chang L-S. 2004. Effects of Tai Chi exercise on physical and mental health of college students. American Journal of Chinese Medicine 32:453–459. DOI: 10.1142/S0192415X04002107.
Wilke CO. 2019. Fundamentals of data visualization: A primer on making informative and compelling figures. O’Reilly Media.
Williams CF. 2021. Move !: The New Science of Body Over Mind. Profile Books.
Woolston C. 2016. Faking it. Nature 529:555–557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7587-555a.
Woolston C. 2019. PhDs: The tortuous truth. Nature 575:403–406. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-03459-7.
Xie Y. 2016. Bookdown: Authoring books and technical documents with R markdown. CRC Press.
Xie Y, Allaire JJ, Grolemund G. 2018. R markdown: The definitive guide. CRC Press.